Jerusalem is only a few minutes away from
Bethlehem, but the difference between their
residents' lives is enormous. On the one hand
you have a comfortable western society, its
peace occasionally interrupted by the shatteringly
murderous explosions of suicide
bombings, on the other you have the life of
an entire people ruled by the mailed military
fist; vulnerable to poverty, humiliation, arbitrary
arrest, injury and death at the hands of
a stronger enemy.
The Israeli peace group Gush Shalom -
Peace Bloc - has spoken of the existence of
two "national narratives", Palestinian and
Israeli, both self-justifying, self-referential and
refusing to acknowledge the other. Thus when
news came out of the assault on Jenin the
Palestinians we were staying with interpreted
the Israeli armys actions as an assault on a
population centre, and the results as a massacre.
The Israeli public, on the other hand,
generally saw this action as an anti-terrorist
operation that resulted in a battle fierce
enough to cause the deaths of Israeli soldiers.
However, I would take issue with Gush
Shalom's assertion about "national" narratives,
and point out that all nationalisms are
the enemies of their "own" people, being
designed to justify a particular local elite.
With regards to cases such as the Jenin
camp it is important to avoid playing the
numbers game, the blame game. As though
that, if it could be proved that one "side" had
killed more, that one side had killed first, that
this would show us a useful path of action.
The temptation also exists to pursue bogus
"objectivity" or "balance" by piling up stories
of terror on both sides and this providing
the cop out of supporting no one - plus, yet
again, the false choice between two "sides".
Tracing patterns of control
As far as I could see, this is not a war; there
are no clear "sides". In Palestine there is,
rather, a highly developed military matrix of
control - armed settlements commanding the
hill tops; roadblocks preventing movement;
militia groups, settlers and police - and now,
with the re-invasion, snipers and armoured
vehicles enforcing a curfew. We need to trace
the sources of these patterns of control and
domination that perpetuate this situation, and
do so without mystifying either "side".
My experiences in Bethlehem have given
me no clear picture of a resolution of this
conflict. I have, however, gained a powerful
sense of what positive action by very few
people can accomplish. This summer the
ISM will be co-ordinating further campaigns,
and the interest among European and US
social movements that the events in Bethlehem
and Ramallah have generated could
mean that this civilian intervention will be an
important force for change.
Note: 1 For a good article explaining why, see
Challenge, March-April 2002, p5 (http://www.hanitzotz.com/challenge). For reports on previous ISM actions, see the January issue of Red Pepper, or PN2446. The Palestinian Centre for Rapproachment Between People (ISM) (email: pcr@p-ol.com; http://www.rapprochement.org).