| |
| |
You are here: Frontpage > Issues > 2444 >
PeaceNews #2444: The quiet war
|
|
In 1998, Denis Halliday, the then Chief UN relief co-ordinator for Iraq, resigned his post in protest at the
impact of continued economic sanctions on the civilian population. Kathy Kelly is a veteran US peace
campaigner, currently best known for her role as joint co-ordinator of the sanctions-busting group Voices
in the Wilderness (US). In July both visited Britain to speak at the "Re-energise" anti-sanctions conference
held in London. Peace News caught up with them for a chat.

The quiet war
Kathy and Denis, interviewed by Ippy
PN: Denis, in your 1998 resignation speech at Harvard you
made some very unequivocal statements about the impact of sanctions on
children in Iraq. Do you feel that these widely reported statements, with
their emphasis on children, have constructed the agenda for anti-sanctions
campaigners and activists worldwide?
Denis: I think my resignation and departure—endorsed 18 months
later by Hans von Sponeck—has certainly opened up the dialogue, and has
made it easier for other people to talk about it. But I don't want to take
credit for starting the snowball, though I would like to think I made a
small contribution. I still am a "suit" but I am using words like
"genocide" and "killing"—and these are the correct words. Just yesterday I
was making the point that the [UN] Secretary General—who is a wonderful
man and a friend of mine—says things like "The Iraqi children are
suffering". To me that is unacceptable. UNICEF reports that 4000-6000
children under five years old are dying every month. "Dying" is closer,
but the real words are that "we the United Nations, the Security Council,
London, Washington and the rest of us, are killing nine or ten thousand
people every month in Iraq". This is an active, not a passive, thing we
are doing. We have made a decision and we are sustaining it. And that
meets the definition of genocide under the UN Convention. And that is why
I use that word [genocide] – though it is greatly offensive to Mr Blair
and baby Bush.
PN: Kathy, you have credited the Iraqi children with fairly
dramatic feats saying, for example, that "The
children in this society pull the adults beyond the despair". Is this just being sentimental – or can you give
some concrete examples?
Kathy: I had the chance to live in Basra for seven weeks last
summer and if you didn't see the children –
who were happy and energetic, running and bouncing around – I think you could see primarily, almost
only, situations that would lend themselves to bleakness and despair.
It would be normal for people to feel resigned and depressed, but what I saw instead was a sort of
determination not to let the conditions get the best of individuals and families. I attribute that to the
children. They are incredibly inventive and well behaved, and they are just how you would expect kids to
be. So I stand by that [quote] and that's been reinforced over the past four years as well.
PN: In the past, Denis, you have talked about the frequency
of child labour and poor educational standards
in Iraq. Are you applying a western model of educational and labour values to a Middle Eastern context?
Or are you merely reflecting changes within Iraqi society since sanctions have been imposed?
Denis: Well, the answer is the latter. If you look at the history
of the Ba'ath Party, for all its failings and all
of its waste of millions of [US] Dollars spent on armaments – which of course we were quite happy to sell
them and watch them being used in the Iran-Iraq war—the fact is that the Ba'ath Party also invested in
social welfare. I think they saw it as the means by which to stay in power. The WHO gave Iraq all kinds of
awards for setting up healthcare systems that were unique in the Arab world.
The educational standards were incredible. It was a huge success story and we hate to give them credit for
it—but they did it. But they did it at a cost, one was military expenditure and the other was that civil and
political rights were neglected.
PN: Kathy, you have parallelled the impact of sanctions on
children with child abuse ("Maintenance of
economic sanctions against Iraq requires us to inflict child sacrifice, to aid and abet the most egregious
instance of child abuse in our world today"). In practical terms, how do you think an abuser should be dealt
with?
Kathy: I think that it is important to isolate someone who is
abusing from the target—or the person who
would be the victim of their abuse. Though I don't recommend prison, islands come to mind sometimes!
But what do you do with a nation that is behaving as a rogue superpower and is behaving abusively? Well,
you would like to think that the United Nations would be able to restrain such a country, but we don't seem
to have the mechanisms to allow that right now.
PN: Denis, in 1999 you were awarded the Morocco North-South
Co-operation prize jointly with the
children of Iraq. Did this "high symbolism" have any practical impact on your relationship with children in
Iraq?
Denis: On a practical level, only that the [prize] money
involved—US$1000, I think—was fed back to the
children of Iraq through Care International. But really it was just a symbolic thing, and I think the children
of Iraq deserve it greatly—much more than I do—because of their dignity and the fact that so many have
survived, despite the appalling conditions.
I met the Iraqi Minister of Education recently and he told me a story about a little boy who sells biscuits
near the Ministry and on his tray [the boy] has about 20 biscuits. One day the Minister said to himself
"Well, I'll just buy the lot. Then maybe he can go home and go to school— where of course he should be".
So he walked up to the little boy and said "I'll take the whole lot" and the little boy said "No you won't.
You can have five! I will not take your charity". That's the sort of pride and dignity that keeps Iraq going.
PN: Do you have any comment on the potential impact of
so-called "smart sanctions" on the children of
Iraq?
Kathy: Well, we could have stores lined with commodities—and they
could be very tantalising—but if
people don't have the cash or purchasing power to buy those commodities, it is a bit irrelevant how much is
there. I suppose some people could identify with it in poor neighbourhoods in the US and perhaps other
countries as well: TV feeds kids a tantalising array of things they would like to have, but their parents can't
always afford to get them, and then the kids can start to feel disappointed and maybe a bit resentful.
As they grow older they will have to deal with what Hans Von Sponeck has called the "undue burden of the
future" and that is going to be very much on their shoulders. They will be poorly educated, many of them
undernourished or suffering from chronic malnourishment symptoms, inheriting an economy that's a
shambles, an infrastructure that doesn't function very well, and they will be very cut off from much of the
rest of the world.
PN: Does the continuing emotive emphasis within
anti-sanctions campaigning on the death of half a million
children, and the ongoing daily hardships children experience as a result of sanctions, ever concern you?
Kathy: Well, I am appalled that more people of conscience aren't
profoundly disturbed by the deaths of so
many hundreds of thousands of children. To be honest I can't get my own head around it. I will stand by
the phrase "child sacrifice". These kids have been punished to death. That should evoke emotional
responses of regret and remorse.
Is it a good idea to also expand beyond a concentrated focus on the death of children—so that people can
have a better sense of the variety of the culture of Iraq? I would certainly think so.
Denis: Well, I think in the establishment, the world of the suits
and the "hardnoses", they probably think
we're a bunch of do-gooders who can't control ourselves. But the fact is that it [the death of half a million
children] is a reality. Some of us do this from the heart and there is room for that
But then you have people like me, who generally don't take that approach, who are "hard, mean, bastards".
We talk about a different Iraq, maybe deliberately to a certain extent. We provide the balance—some
information and data—and put it in more cold, logistical terms. But I know that often many people respond
better to Kathy than to me, because the anecdotal material helps them to understand.
PN: Denis, as someone who appears to operate in a
non-aligned way, with your own agenda, you have in
fact spent the past three years being frequently exposed to a fairly large number of peace activists and
campaigners. Has this exposure impacted your thinking, and if so in what ways?
Denis: Well, I have very deliberately remained independent. I will
work with everybody, I will talk with
everybody, I will accept invitations from everybody—with the exception of the government of Iraq. But I
don't need to be associated with any one group in order for me to do what I want to do.
I think people see me as this UN bureaucrat who suddenly saw the light or something. Well, before I went
into the UN I was a student and my father was head of the Irish pacifist movement for 20 years. He is a
Quaker, I am a Quaker and we grew up with a tradition of pacifism and of activist work—it's one of the
things Quakers do best, or used to at least. I was a volunteer in east Africa where I worked in a community
centre and I spent quite a bit of time working on issues such as Irish neutrality and in the anti-apartheid
movement.
I resigned [from the UN] because I found that what I was doing for a living was totally incompatible with
my conscience and that I could not continue to do it. I felt I could do better by being outside.
PN: What do you think peace activists could do—or should be
doing—to help and support the Iraqi people,
Iraqi civil society and the development of alternatives within Iraq?
Kathy: Well, I do believe in this person-to-person diplomacy
idea. I think it is also helpful to the Iraqi
people when they know that there are dramatic actions being taken here in support of their civil society
some day being able to flourish.
I think we should identify the maximum that we can do—I think that if people can't find a form of action
that can be sustained and is consistent, they may find themselves wondering in the future "where was I?"
and "how did I let that happen?".
Voices in the Wilderness USA, 1460 West Carmen Avenue, Chicago, IL
60640, USA (email kkelly@igc.apc.org).
Voices in the Wilderness UK, 16b Cherwell Street, Oxford OX4 1BG
(+44 1865 243 232; email voices@viwk.freeserve.co.uk)
Care International, 58/10 Boulevard du Régent, 1000 Brussels,
Belgium (+32 2 502 43 33; fax 502 82 02; email
info@care-international.org; http:www.care-international.org).
|
|
|
|