| |
| |
You are here: Frontpage > Issues > 2442 >

|
|
Since Dayton, Croatia has been developing in the typical western model:
privatisations, foreign banks, Partnership for Peace, and a new liberal government.
But in this post-war society there are both unresolved and new issues that threaten to
polarise the population. Drazen Simlesa reports.
Croatia - a small country for a great plunder
Drazen Simlesa
Several years ago the Croatian Department of Tourism led a big marketing campaign
to try to attract the long dreamed about tourists who were still afraid of the
instability in the region. The Department promised a small country for a great
holiday. The only thing left out of the entire advertising trick is in the title of this
article.
The minister who devised this tourism slogan subsequently had to step down from
government due to being exposed for nepotism, after hiring his wife who applied for
a job in his department under her maiden name. To make things even more
tragicomic, the minister tried to justify his actions by claiming he didnt know his
wifes maiden name. Oh, modern love...
This is just a small example, but it shows, quite vividly, the corruption of the former
right-wing government, led by the ex-general, Franjo Tudjman, who hasnt lived to
see the total collapse of his followers during the general election just over a year ago.
The regime that hid plunder and murder behind national interest left the Croatian
population with a foreign debt four times larger than before taking office (now
equivalent to US$ 2200 per head), and a one-way ticket to emigration for about
250,000 young people (including the exiled Serbs).
Selling the family silver
Todays Croatia meets the conditions necessary to be given the status of a highly
indebted country, as the ratio of debt in the GNP has risen to 57% and the risk limit is
set at 30%. Along with additional loans owed to the IMF and the World Bank, both
governments (Tudjmans and the new) have been trying to settle the foreign debt
through selling off the state-owned companies (HT, HEP, INA, banks, hotels...), for a
pittanceie privatising them. What neither government seems to have considered is
how they will return the loans when there is nothing left to privatise.
At the beginning of year 2000 Croatia elected, roughly speaking, a social-liberal
coalition of six parties (yes, they did translate Giddenss The Third Way) which
announced a change in direction from the former, and dangerous, policy of
isolationism. Unfortunately, the changes that had been promised have ended up in
the embellishing of the façade, while the foundations continue to decay. The
Croatian population was left crushed between two false alternatives, both with their
basis in an identical violence, since neither provide a real choice. The only choice is
between a hundred rich families controlling the countrys entire property and asset
base, or a complete sell-out to foreigners for a pittance. If you are against the first
choice, you will be accused of being a traitor of the homeland, and if you are against
the latter choice, you are against Croatias integration with the rest of the world.
With more and more debts, the countrys main problemwhich has been swelling
quietly all these years and momentarily reached its peak in the new millenniumis
the money flowing out of Croatia. Foreign banks make up 87% of the banking market
in Croatia, and all the money leaves the country, while there are very few real
investments actually made in Croatia.
Granting monopolies
With all this, the number of unemployed, now approaching 400,000 (the equivalent
of more than 20% of total labour force), doesnt come as a surprise. Even the leaders
of the present government expressed disapproval with the huge profits being drawn
out of Croatian Deutche Telekom (which holds 35% of shares in Croatian Telekom)
which resulted in a criminal investigation conducted by the police department into
certain irregularities during the process of privatisation.
And people in Croatia will feel the consequences of the affair with the energy
corporation Enron, for a long time to comeas in India, Egypt, Bolivia and other
countries where this corporation has violated human rights and polluted the
environment. Enron was supposed to serve as a lobbyist to the former government to
ensure Tudjmans visit with Clinton, and Croatias entry to the WTO, so the
government signed a contract guaranteeing that Croatia will buy electricity from
Enrons power plant, at the highest prices in Europe, regardless of Croatias
demands during the next 20 years!
Those who disputed the Enron contract, citing the unfavorable terms for the Croatian
population, signed an even more unfavorable contract with Enron last year after
being elected to office. At first the new government tried to break the original
contract. But after being pressurised with all kinds of blackmail about further help
(with what?), primarily through the protests of the US ambassador to Croatia,
William Montgomery, and with the unfavorable effect it would have in the business
world, the government caved in.
With great ceremony they signed a new contract including an agreement to pay
damages to the corporation because of the delay in the construction of their plant.
Now Croatia is obliged to buy electricity from the sole supplier, Enron, for a price
90% higher than usual in the European market, until Enrons expenses are covered.
The free-trade myth
Not long after signing the contract and thus ensuring the monopoly, not only in
Croatia but also in the entire region, Enron issued an advertisement in almost all the
mass media. In this they hypocritically informed the population that in future,
through the liberalisation of the energy market, they would be able to choose from
whom and at what price they buy electricity. So, after protecting itself from any
surprises in the market, Enron declared that energy is a product just like anything
else, and gave us, in the most cynical way of all, a manifestation of the free trade
political dogma.
Tudjmans dream to be officially invited to visit Clintonremained an unfulfilled
wish; but the new president, Stipe Mesic, and Prime Minister Ivica Racan, had the
honour last August. So, guess which corporation paid for the business lunch of the
representatives of Croatian government and the executives of certain US
corporations in the American Chamber of Commerce? At the end of August last year
Enrons CEO had announced a 25% increase in the price of electricity, which took
effect in October 2000.
Greenwash
The next example reports on Croatias involvement in global affairs. Bad ones,
unfortunately. Not long after the newspapers had reported on extremely poor
working conditions ($0.22 per hour) and the violation of human rights (child labour)
in McDonalds toy factories in China, the report on the extremely disrespectful
attitude of McDonalds towards their employees in Croatia was published.Thirteen
cases of violations of work safety had been discovered. The stories from the
employees themselves range from unpaid overtime to not being allowed to keep tips.
McDonalds spokesperson for Croatia, also in charge of human resources, rejected
all accusations, claiming that all complaints can be delivered to her personally, that
all employees are allowed to engage in union activities in their free time (but that the
workers themselves refused to do so), and that the atmosphere in McDonalds is
ideal, everybody is on a first name basis so there is no apparent hierarchical
structure. Like in every other greenwash story, to show its human side, McDonalds
donated $7000 for the medical treatment of a sick child.
Partnership for Peace
Soon after the change of government Croatia became a member of Partnership for
Peace. This has resulted in closer collaboration with NATO and by the end of the last
year their army exercise was carried out at a military range in Slunj near the Plitvice
National Park. Croatias Ministry of Defense has refused to give information on the
costs of this exercise.
An even more tragic fact is that the petition against the military exercise organised
by local environmental groups was only signed by 125 people, which only pointed to
the vast amount of work ahead for the environmental movement in Croatia.
Often local people themselves comment on the destruction of the environment by
army exercises, but excuse it with comments like man, these soldiers order 100
pizzas in my restaurant. These short-term advantages dominate over long-term
strategies based on environmental sustainability.
An ultra right-wing group, best known for raising a monument to a notorious fascist
World War II war criminal, also protested against the NATO exercise, but they
protested with their ever-present racism and warnings against bad imperialists from
the USA, expressing the need for isolationism from western decadence. This is why
activists from the environmental groups had to be very careful and emphasise their
antimilitarism and environmental consciousness. Generally speaking, when violent
and right wing groups fall from power the problem is not solved. Sometimes we end
up with the impression that they were less violent before they lost power, because
Tudjmans government kept them on a short leash. This kind of collaboration with
the government no longer exists, so alongside verbal threats there are more and more
terrorist actions. Bombs are not just for destroying monuments with anti-fascist
symbols, but also for the killing of unwanted opponentswhich is what happened
to one of the witnesses in a war-crimes case taking place at the International Tribunal
at the Hague. The perpetrators of these attacks have not yet been found.
Right-wing reactions
Because of the possible extradition of one of the Croatian militarys generals for war
crimes against civilians during the 1990s, Croatia is under a real siege by right-wing
groups who call for a coup and who spread nationalist and other kinds of hatred. At
a rally in Split, in February, there were 150,000 people waving pictures of this
general, like some Orwellian scene, identifying with him. Once again the concept of
the mass is gaining momentum in this sad Balkan tale.
Anti-war, anti-militarist, and other civilian initiatives have sent out an appeal
condemning all crime, regardless of motive or nationality. We also refuse to be put
under a uniform and unified collective umbrella, with no regard to ideology, and we
will therefore keep emphasising the need for the appreciation of variety and
uniqueness in this world. Regardless of the few positive steps that have been taken in
the new millennium, facing our own responsibilities and the crimes that were
committed during the war, still remains a problem that needs to be worked on in this
region. No matter that there is, fortunately, no more real danger of war. The moment
we forget how to laugh and enjoy life, the language of hate and fear, like that spread
and encouraged in Split, will be without obstacle.
Drazen Simlesa has worked with ARK and ATTACK, and gives seminars on
globalisation.
Anti-war Campaign Croatia (ARK), Vukovarska 237c, 1000 Zagreb, Croatia (Tel/fax
+385 1 615 7183; email ark@zamir.net).
|
|
|
|